PlainFlights

Charlotte to Cincinnati

Charlotte, NC → Cincinnati, OH

Total Flights

11,894

On-Time Rate

78.7%

Avg Delay

70.6 min

Distance

335 mi

Carriers

16

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 143 55 1 0 OH,AA,MQ
Nov 2025 145 26 1 0 MQ,OH,AA
Oct 2025 150 30 0 0 AA,OH
Sep 2025 138 23 1 0 OH,AA
Aug 2025 145 53 1 0 AA,MQ,OH
Jul 2025 166 60 5 1 AA,OH,MQ
Jun 2025 152 65 2 0 AA,OH,MQ
May 2025 182 51 4 0 AA,OH
Apr 2025 195 49 2 0 OH,AA
Mar 2025 175 41 4 0 AA,OH
Feb 2025 158 42 5 1 AA,OH
Jan 2025 170 44 11 0 AA,OH
Dec 2024 177 46 0 0 AA,OH
Nov 2024 178 30 0 0 OH,AA
Oct 2024 201 37 0 0 AA,OH
Sep 2024 177 47 1 0 OH,AA,F9
Aug 2024 218 61 7 0 AA,F9,OH
Jul 2024 227 111 8 0 AA,F9,OH
Jun 2024 222 51 4 1 AA,F9,OH
May 2024 222 96 0 1 AA,F9,MQ,OH
Apr 2024 173 44 0 0 AA,OH
Mar 2024 155 45 0 0 AA,OH
Feb 2024 143 33 0 0 AA,OH
Jan 2024 148 55 1 0 AA,OH

Cancellation Rate

1.4%

58 of 4,160 flights

Diversion Rate

0.1%

4 of 4,160 flights

What the Data Says About CLT to CVG

The Charlotte to Cincinnati corridor (CLT → CVG) covers roughly 335 miles and is served by 16 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 11,894 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 78.7% on-time rate with an average delay of 70.6 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 4,160 flights were recorded on this pairing — 58 cancelled (1.4%) and 4 diverted (0.1%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 16 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 11,894 total flights analyzed, the 78.7% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 70.6-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Sep 2025 posted the best performance on this corridor at 83% on-time, while Jul 2024 came in at 51% on-time — a 32-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the CLT to CVG route, the combination of a 78.7% on-time rate, 70.6-minute average delay, 1.4% recent cancellation rate, and 16 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from CLT to CVG?
Flights from Charlotte to Cincinnati have a 78.7% on-time rate based on 11,894 flights. The average delay is 70.6 minutes. The best recent month was Sep 2025 with 83% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for CLT to CVG?
Over the last 24 months, 1.4% of flights on this route were cancelled (58 of 4,160 flights) and 0.1% were diverted.
How far is the flight from CLT to CVG?
The flight distance from Charlotte (CLT) to Cincinnati (CVG) is approximately 335 miles. This route is served by 16 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from CLT to CVG?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Sep 2025 (83% on-time). The worst was Jul 2024 (51% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from CLT to CVG?
The Charlotte to Cincinnati route is served by 16 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from CLT to CVG?
Flights from Charlotte to Cincinnati experience an average delay of 70.6 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 78.7% based on 11,894 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial