PlainFlights

State · UT · 2020–2025 BTS data

Utah

According to PlainFlights' state traffic ranking (BTS On-Time Performance total flights), Utah ranks #19 of 53 US states by total flight operations (most flights = #1).

Data updated 2026-06-13

85.8%
On-time
+6.8 pts
vs US avg
77 min
Delay when late
0.58%
Cancelled
#19 of 53
Corpus placement

State reliability verdict

According to U.S. DOT BTS data, Utah is a mid-book state: 1,396,881 operations at 7 airports run 85.8% on-time, 6.8 pts above the 79% U.S. average. Among tracked airports, CDC leads locally at 92% on-time.

85.8%
statewide on-time
+6.8 pts
vs US average
7
airports tracked
0.58%
cancellation rate

On-time means arrived less than 15 minutes after schedule. Figures are historical BTS averages, not a guarantee for any single flight.

Utah - all airports - flight delay tier distribution Stacked horizontal bar showing what percent of Utah - all airports flights fell into each Bureau of Transportation Statistics delay tier: on-time (under 15 minutes late), delayed (15-60 minutes), heavily delayed (60-120 minutes), severe (120+ minutes), and cancelled. Utah - all airports Flight delay tiers · BTS On-Time Performance methodology 85.8% 14.2% 0% 100% On time <15m · 85.8% Delayed 15–60m · 14.2% Cancelled cnx · 0.6%
Tiers follow Bureau of Transportation Statistics On-Time Performance definitions, a flight is on-time if it arrives less than 15 minutes after schedule.

Utah vs all states by total flight operations

Where this state's BTS On-Time Performance flight count sits among every state with tracked operations (traffic density, not on-time quality)

1,396,881 Top 36% more flights than 64% of 53 states

States, banded by total BTS-tracked flights

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source BTS On-Time Performance · 2026-06-13

Airports in Utah

Utah airports ranked by on-time rate

7 BTS-tracked airports, led by CDC at 92%

On-time rate by airport

%

What this shows Airports here range from 76.5% to 92% on-time.

Code Airport City Flights On-Time Avg Delay (when late)
SLC Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake City 1,319,985 85.8% 76.0 min
SGU St. George, UT St. George 39,026 88% 86.6 min
PVU Provo, UT Provo 20,217 76.5% 97.6 min
CDC Cedar City, UT Cedar City 7,071 92% 94.8 min
CNY Moab, UT Moab 5,341 87.3% 106.0 min
VEL Vernal, UT Vernal 4,784 86.8% 101.5 min
OGD Ogden, UT Ogden 457 76.8% 50.8 min

Utah traffic-scale reading

The standout signal in Utah is traffic scale: 1,396,881 BTS flights place it #19 of 53 by book size. That mid-book footprint sits beside a 85.8% on-time rate (6.8 pts above the 79% U.S. average), 198,323 delayed departures, and a 0.58% cancellation rate.

Mid-volume books still show a clear airport fingerprint: Salt Lake City, UT (SLC) handles 1,319,985 flights at 85.8% on-time.

On the recent 24-month tape, delay pressure is lightest in Oct 2024 and heaviest in Jul 2024. On reliability, Cedar City, UT (CDC) posts the highest on-time rate at 92% across 7,071 flights. On-time performance explained.

Using Utah's data

Utah's statewide on-time book is stronger than most peers; remaining risk sits in the busiest airport and delay mix, not a weak headline rate.

  • Cedar City, UT (CDC) is the most reliable airport in Utah among those with meaningful traffic. CDC profile
  • Salt Lake City, UT handles the most traffic in the state; its performance weighs heavily on the state average. SLC profile
  • See how Utah compares with every other state that has BTS-tracked airports. All states

State averages are flight-weighted across all reporting airports in the state; a single busy airport can dominate the figure.

Data sourced from U.S. Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) On-Time Performance data. See our methodology for details. Utah figures formatted by PlainFlights from BTS On-Time Performance.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) Airline on-time performance and operational reliability · 2025