PlainFlights

Pittsburgh to Orlando

Pittsburgh, PA → Orlando, FL

Total Flights

11,896

On-Time Rate

79.8%

Avg Delay

72.1 min

Distance

834 mi

Carriers

10

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 186 56 1 1 YX,WN,F9,NK
Nov 2025 172 32 1 0 F9,NK,WN
Oct 2025 187 35 2 0 WN,F9,NK
Sep 2025 151 25 0 0 WN,NK,F9
Aug 2025 167 44 0 1 WN,F9,NK
Jul 2025 170 39 1 0 NK,WN,F9
Jun 2025 172 50 2 0 NK,WN,F9
May 2025 175 49 0 3 NK,WN,F9
Apr 2025 208 30 0 0 F9,NK,WN
Mar 2025 233 42 5 0 NK,WN,F9
Feb 2025 182 37 1 0 WN,F9,NK
Jan 2025 163 31 0 0 WN,NK
Dec 2024 160 26 0 0 NK,WN
Nov 2024 164 5 0 0 NK,WN
Oct 2024 192 24 14 0 WN,NK
Sep 2024 151 18 1 0 WN,NK
Aug 2024 167 39 3 0 NK,WN
Jul 2024 191 55 5 0 NK,WN
Jun 2024 211 54 1 0 NK,WN
May 2024 220 54 2 1 NK,WN
Apr 2024 219 33 3 0 F9,NK,WN
Mar 2024 240 62 4 0 F9,NK,WN
Feb 2024 208 34 1 0 F9,NK,WN
Jan 2024 221 70 3 0 F9,NK,WN

Cancellation Rate

1.1%

50 of 4,510 flights

Diversion Rate

0.1%

6 of 4,510 flights

What the Data Says About PIT to MCO

The Pittsburgh to Orlando corridor (PIT → MCO) covers roughly 834 miles and is served by 10 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 11,896 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 79.8% on-time rate with an average delay of 72.1 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 4,510 flights were recorded on this pairing — 50 cancelled (1.1%) and 6 diverted (0.1%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 10 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 11,896 total flights analyzed, the 79.8% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 72.1-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Nov 2024 posted the best performance on this corridor at 97% on-time, while Jan 2024 came in at 68% on-time — a 29-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the PIT to MCO route, the combination of a 79.8% on-time rate, 72.1-minute average delay, 1.1% recent cancellation rate, and 10 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from PIT to MCO?
Flights from Pittsburgh to Orlando have a 79.8% on-time rate based on 11,896 flights. The average delay is 72.1 minutes. The best recent month was Nov 2024 with 97% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for PIT to MCO?
Over the last 24 months, 1.1% of flights on this route were cancelled (50 of 4,510 flights) and 0.1% were diverted.
How far is the flight from PIT to MCO?
The flight distance from Pittsburgh (PIT) to Orlando (MCO) is approximately 834 miles. This route is served by 10 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from PIT to MCO?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Nov 2024 (97% on-time). The worst was Jan 2024 (68% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from PIT to MCO?
The Pittsburgh to Orlando route is served by 10 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from PIT to MCO?
Flights from Pittsburgh to Orlando experience an average delay of 72.1 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 79.8% based on 11,896 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial