PlainFlights

Cincinnati to Charlotte

Cincinnati, OH → Charlotte, NC

Total Flights

11,892

On-Time Rate

80.6%

Avg Delay

85.7 min

Distance

335 mi

Carriers

16

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 143 46 1 1 OH,AA,MQ
Nov 2025 144 20 1 0 MQ,OH,AA
Oct 2025 150 24 0 0 AA,OH
Sep 2025 138 18 1 1 OH,AA
Aug 2025 146 38 1 0 AA,MQ,OH
Jul 2025 165 40 5 0 AA,OH,MQ
Jun 2025 151 45 2 1 AA,OH,MQ
May 2025 183 58 7 0 AA,OH
Apr 2025 195 48 3 0 OH,AA
Mar 2025 174 26 2 0 AA,OH
Feb 2025 158 44 4 0 AA,OH
Jan 2025 170 23 11 0 AA,OH
Dec 2024 177 28 0 0 AA,OH
Nov 2024 178 36 0 0 OH,AA
Oct 2024 201 43 0 0 AA,OH
Sep 2024 177 49 3 0 OH,AA,F9
Aug 2024 218 59 7 1 AA,F9,OH
Jul 2024 226 91 10 1 AA,F9,OH
Jun 2024 223 49 3 0 AA,F9,OH
May 2024 222 84 0 0 AA,F9,MQ,OH
Apr 2024 173 42 0 2 AA,OH
Mar 2024 155 28 0 0 AA,OH
Feb 2024 143 21 0 0 AA,OH
Jan 2024 148 47 2 0 AA,OH

Cancellation Rate

1.5%

63 of 4,158 flights

Diversion Rate

0.2%

7 of 4,158 flights

What the Data Says About CVG to CLT

The Cincinnati to Charlotte corridor (CVG → CLT) covers roughly 335 miles and is served by 16 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 11,892 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 80.6% on-time rate with an average delay of 85.7 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 4,158 flights were recorded on this pairing — 63 cancelled (1.5%) and 7 diverted (0.2%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 16 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 11,892 total flights analyzed, the 80.6% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 85.7-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Sep 2025 posted the best performance on this corridor at 87% on-time, while Jul 2024 came in at 60% on-time — a 27-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the CVG to CLT route, the combination of a 80.6% on-time rate, 85.7-minute average delay, 1.5% recent cancellation rate, and 16 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from CVG to CLT?
Flights from Cincinnati to Charlotte have a 80.6% on-time rate based on 11,892 flights. The average delay is 85.7 minutes. The best recent month was Sep 2025 with 87% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for CVG to CLT?
Over the last 24 months, 1.5% of flights on this route were cancelled (63 of 4,158 flights) and 0.2% were diverted.
How far is the flight from CVG to CLT?
The flight distance from Cincinnati (CVG) to Charlotte (CLT) is approximately 335 miles. This route is served by 16 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from CVG to CLT?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Sep 2025 (87% on-time). The worst was Jul 2024 (60% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from CVG to CLT?
The Cincinnati to Charlotte route is served by 16 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from CVG to CLT?
Flights from Cincinnati to Charlotte experience an average delay of 85.7 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 80.6% based on 11,892 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial