PlainFlights

Fayetteville to Chicago

Fayetteville, AR → Chicago, IL

Total Flights

9,253

On-Time Rate

82.9%

Avg Delay

75.0 min

Distance

522 mi

Carriers

21

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 124 31 1 0 MQ
Nov 2025 130 36 3 0 MQ
Oct 2025 143 33 0 0 MQ
Sep 2025 121 19 0 0 MQ,YX
Aug 2025 134 31 2 2 YX,MQ
Jul 2025 141 50 4 0 MQ
Jun 2025 170 54 0 0 AA,OO,UA,YX,MQ
May 2025 169 44 2 0 AA,OO,YX,MQ
Apr 2025 140 39 5 0 MQ,OO,AA
Mar 2025 139 40 3 1 OO,YX,MQ
Feb 2025 128 28 4 0 OO,YX,MQ
Jan 2025 145 31 3 0 OO,YX,MQ
Dec 2024 165 37 0 0 MQ,OO
Nov 2024 188 22 1 0 OO,MQ,YX
Oct 2024 174 17 0 0 MQ,OO
Sep 2024 204 31 1 0 YX,OO,MQ
Aug 2024 205 30 0 2 MQ,YX,OO
Jul 2024 160 35 0 0 MQ,OO
Jun 2024 164 25 0 1 AA,MQ,OO,UA
May 2024 173 38 4 0 MQ,OO,UA
Apr 2024 115 11 0 1 MQ,OO
Mar 2024 163 18 1 0 MQ,YX,OO
Feb 2024 137 15 0 1 MQ,OO
Jan 2024 139 31 12 1 MQ,OO

Cancellation Rate

1.3%

46 of 3,671 flights

Diversion Rate

0.2%

9 of 3,671 flights

What the Data Says About XNA to ORD

The Fayetteville to Chicago corridor (XNA → ORD) covers roughly 522 miles and is served by 21 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 9,253 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 82.9% on-time rate with an average delay of 75.0 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 3,671 flights were recorded on this pairing — 46 cancelled (1.3%) and 9 diverted (0.2%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 21 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 9,253 total flights analyzed, the 82.9% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 75.0-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Apr 2024 posted the best performance on this corridor at 90% on-time, while Jul 2025 came in at 65% on-time — a 26-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the XNA to ORD route, the combination of a 82.9% on-time rate, 75.0-minute average delay, 1.3% recent cancellation rate, and 21 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from XNA to ORD?
Flights from Fayetteville to Chicago have a 82.9% on-time rate based on 9,253 flights. The average delay is 75.0 minutes. The best recent month was Apr 2024 with 90% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for XNA to ORD?
Over the last 24 months, 1.3% of flights on this route were cancelled (46 of 3,671 flights) and 0.2% were diverted.
How far is the flight from XNA to ORD?
The flight distance from Fayetteville (XNA) to Chicago (ORD) is approximately 522 miles. This route is served by 21 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from XNA to ORD?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Apr 2024 (90% on-time). The worst was Jul 2025 (65% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from XNA to ORD?
The Fayetteville to Chicago route is served by 21 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from XNA to ORD?
Flights from Fayetteville to Chicago experience an average delay of 75.0 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 82.9% based on 9,253 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial