PlainFlights

Charlotte to Wilmington

Charlotte, NC → Wilmington, NC

Total Flights

14,374

On-Time Rate

81.5%

Avg Delay

69.9 min

Distance

185 mi

Carriers

14

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 138 31 1 0 OH,AA
Nov 2025 146 23 0 0 MQ,OH,AA
Oct 2025 232 48 0 1 AA,OH
Sep 2025 220 35 0 0 OH,AA
Aug 2025 149 34 1 0 AA,OH
Jul 2025 150 46 3 0 AA,OH
Jun 2025 158 52 3 0 AA,OH,MQ
May 2025 239 53 3 0 AA,OH,MQ
Apr 2025 198 50 1 0 MQ,OH,AA
Mar 2025 216 51 3 0 AA,OH,MQ
Feb 2025 184 49 6 0 AA,OH,MQ
Jan 2025 197 28 15 0 AA,OH
Dec 2024 237 59 0 1 AA,OH
Nov 2024 214 32 0 0 MQ,OH,AA
Oct 2024 259 41 0 0 MQ,AA,OH
Sep 2024 239 51 4 0 OH,AA,MQ
Aug 2024 265 91 12 0 AA,MQ,OH
Jul 2024 262 110 11 0 AA,OH
Jun 2024 214 56 3 1 AA,MQ,OH
May 2024 266 82 2 2 AA,OH
Apr 2024 252 76 0 0 AA,OH
Mar 2024 212 46 1 1 AA,OH
Feb 2024 199 34 0 0 AA,OH
Jan 2024 208 57 3 0 AA,OH

Cancellation Rate

1.4%

72 of 5,054 flights

Diversion Rate

0.1%

6 of 5,054 flights

What the Data Says About CLT to ILM

The Charlotte to Wilmington corridor (CLT → ILM) covers roughly 185 miles and is served by 14 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 14,374 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 81.5% on-time rate with an average delay of 69.9 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 5,054 flights were recorded on this pairing — 72 cancelled (1.4%) and 6 diverted (0.1%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 14 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 14,374 total flights analyzed, the 81.5% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 69.9-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Jan 2025 posted the best performance on this corridor at 86% on-time, while Jul 2024 came in at 58% on-time — a 28-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the CLT to ILM route, the combination of a 81.5% on-time rate, 69.9-minute average delay, 1.4% recent cancellation rate, and 14 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from CLT to ILM?
Flights from Charlotte to Wilmington have a 81.5% on-time rate based on 14,374 flights. The average delay is 69.9 minutes. The best recent month was Jan 2025 with 86% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for CLT to ILM?
Over the last 24 months, 1.4% of flights on this route were cancelled (72 of 5,054 flights) and 0.1% were diverted.
How far is the flight from CLT to ILM?
The flight distance from Charlotte (CLT) to Wilmington (ILM) is approximately 185 miles. This route is served by 14 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from CLT to ILM?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Jan 2025 (86% on-time). The worst was Jul 2024 (58% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from CLT to ILM?
The Charlotte to Wilmington route is served by 14 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from CLT to ILM?
Flights from Charlotte to Wilmington experience an average delay of 69.9 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 81.5% based on 14,374 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial