PlainFlights

Chicago to Albany

Chicago, IL → Albany, NY

Total Flights

7,283

On-Time Rate

80.4%

Avg Delay

65.9 min

Distance

723 mi

Carriers

28

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 170 60 5 0 YX,MQ,UA,OO
Nov 2025 217 50 11 0 OO,UA,MQ,YX
Oct 2025 209 48 0 0 OO,UA,YX,MQ
Sep 2025 193 32 0 1 MQ,UA,OO
Aug 2025 192 45 4 0 OO,YX,MQ,UA
Jul 2025 198 53 3 0 UA,YX,MQ
Jun 2025 198 51 1 0 OO,UA,YX,MQ
May 2025 127 21 0 1 OO,UA,YX,MQ
Apr 2025 100 15 3 0 OO,UA,YX
Mar 2025 84 13 0 0 YX,OO,UA
Feb 2025 63 12 0 0 OO,UA,YX
Jan 2025 67 17 0 0 OO,UA
Dec 2024 74 28 0 1 OO,UA
Nov 2024 86 16 0 0 OO,UA
Oct 2024 136 26 0 0 UA,MQ,OO,YX
Sep 2024 140 30 0 0 YX,OO,UA,MQ
Aug 2024 120 38 0 0 OO,UA
Jul 2024 119 34 2 1 OO,UA
Jun 2024 114 26 1 0 MQ,OO,UA
May 2024 121 22 0 0 MQ,YX,OO,UA
Apr 2024 115 18 0 0 MQ,OO,UA,YX
Mar 2024 105 19 0 1 MQ,YX,OO,UA
Feb 2024 78 10 0 0 MQ,OO,UA,YX
Jan 2024 62 25 1 0 UA

Cancellation Rate

1.0%

31 of 3,088 flights

Diversion Rate

0.2%

5 of 3,088 flights

What the Data Says About ORD to ALB

The Chicago to Albany corridor (ORD → ALB) covers roughly 723 miles and is served by 28 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 7,283 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 80.4% on-time rate with an average delay of 65.9 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 3,088 flights were recorded on this pairing — 31 cancelled (1.0%) and 5 diverted (0.2%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 28 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 7,283 total flights analyzed, the 80.4% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 65.9-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Feb 2024 posted the best performance on this corridor at 87% on-time, while Jan 2024 came in at 60% on-time — a 28-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the ORD to ALB route, the combination of a 80.4% on-time rate, 65.9-minute average delay, 1.0% recent cancellation rate, and 28 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from ORD to ALB?
Flights from Chicago to Albany have a 80.4% on-time rate based on 7,283 flights. The average delay is 65.9 minutes. The best recent month was Feb 2024 with 87% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for ORD to ALB?
Over the last 24 months, 1.0% of flights on this route were cancelled (31 of 3,088 flights) and 0.2% were diverted.
How far is the flight from ORD to ALB?
The flight distance from Chicago (ORD) to Albany (ALB) is approximately 723 miles. This route is served by 28 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from ORD to ALB?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Feb 2024 (87% on-time). The worst was Jan 2024 (60% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from ORD to ALB?
The Chicago to Albany route is served by 28 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from ORD to ALB?
Flights from Chicago to Albany experience an average delay of 65.9 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 80.4% based on 7,283 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial