PlainFlights

Charlotte to Little Rock

Charlotte, NC → Little Rock, AR

Total Flights

7,033

On-Time Rate

78.9%

Avg Delay

64.9 min

Distance

640 mi

Carriers

15

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 111 26 1 0 OH,AA,MQ
Nov 2025 112 14 4 0 MQ,OH,AA
Oct 2025 93 16 0 0 OH,MQ
Sep 2025 68 8 0 0 MQ,OH
Aug 2025 76 17 3 0 MQ,OH
Jul 2025 104 21 3 0 OH,MQ
Jun 2025 112 32 5 1 OH,MQ
May 2025 120 26 5 0 OH,MQ
Apr 2025 120 30 5 2 MQ,OH
Mar 2025 117 37 2 0 OH,MQ
Feb 2025 103 28 7 0 OH,MQ
Jan 2025 118 25 6 0 OH,MQ
Dec 2024 117 41 0 0 AA,MQ,OH
Nov 2024 105 11 0 0 MQ,OH,AA
Oct 2024 114 26 0 0 MQ,AA,OH
Sep 2024 105 38 3 1 OH,AA,MQ
Aug 2024 92 26 0 0 AA,MQ,OH
Jul 2024 93 38 1 0 AA,MQ,OH,YX
Jun 2024 90 26 3 0 AA,MQ,OH
May 2024 94 48 0 0 AA,MQ,OH,YX
Apr 2024 90 30 1 0 AA,MQ,OH
Mar 2024 93 19 0 1 AA,MQ,OH
Feb 2024 87 13 0 0 AA,MQ,OH
Jan 2024 98 34 1 0 AA,MQ,OH

Cancellation Rate

2.1%

50 of 2,432 flights

Diversion Rate

0.2%

5 of 2,432 flights

What the Data Says About CLT to LIT

The Charlotte to Little Rock corridor (CLT → LIT) covers roughly 640 miles and is served by 15 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 7,033 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 78.9% on-time rate with an average delay of 64.9 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 2,432 flights were recorded on this pairing — 50 cancelled (2.1%) and 5 diverted (0.2%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 15 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 7,033 total flights analyzed, the 78.9% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 64.9-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Nov 2024 posted the best performance on this corridor at 90% on-time, while May 2024 came in at 49% on-time — a 41-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the CLT to LIT route, the combination of a 78.9% on-time rate, 64.9-minute average delay, 2.1% recent cancellation rate, and 15 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from CLT to LIT?
Flights from Charlotte to Little Rock have a 78.9% on-time rate based on 7,033 flights. The average delay is 64.9 minutes. The best recent month was Nov 2024 with 90% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for CLT to LIT?
Over the last 24 months, 2.1% of flights on this route were cancelled (50 of 2,432 flights) and 0.2% were diverted.
How far is the flight from CLT to LIT?
The flight distance from Charlotte (CLT) to Little Rock (LIT) is approximately 640 miles. This route is served by 15 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from CLT to LIT?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Nov 2024 (90% on-time). The worst was May 2024 (49% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from CLT to LIT?
The Charlotte to Little Rock route is served by 15 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from CLT to LIT?
Flights from Charlotte to Little Rock experience an average delay of 64.9 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 78.9% based on 7,033 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial