PlainFlights

Burbank to San Francisco

Burbank, CA → San Francisco, CA

Total Flights

15,189

On-Time Rate

77.2%

Avg Delay

68.5 min

Distance

326 mi

Carriers

11

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 257 79 6 1 UA,OO
Nov 2025 261 75 12 2 OO,UA
Oct 2025 254 73 0 0 OO,UA
Sep 2025 225 51 0 0 UA,OO
Aug 2025 238 52 0 0 OO,UA
Jul 2025 245 73 1 2 OO,UA
Jun 2025 248 57 0 0 OO,UA
May 2025 281 76 1 0 OO,UA,F9
Apr 2025 281 59 1 0 F9,OO,UA
Mar 2025 265 81 4 1 OO,UA,F9
Feb 2025 229 56 7 0 OO,UA,F9
Jan 2025 260 36 7 0 OO,UA,F9
Dec 2024 296 93 1 0 F9,OO,UA
Nov 2024 296 93 11 0 OO,UA,F9
Oct 2024 276 68 0 0 UA,OO
Sep 2024 262 70 0 0 OO,UA
Aug 2024 271 49 3 0 OO,UA
Jul 2024 273 40 4 0 OO,UA
Jun 2024 198 66 1 1 OO,UA
May 2024 232 105 1 3 OO,UA
Apr 2024 231 125 6 3 OO,UA
Mar 2024 248 129 6 6 OO,UA
Feb 2024 245 98 15 1 OO
Jan 2024 293 79 1 0 WN,OO,UA

Cancellation Rate

1.4%

88 of 6,165 flights

Diversion Rate

0.3%

20 of 6,165 flights

What the Data Says About BUR to SFO

The Burbank to San Francisco corridor (BUR → SFO) covers roughly 326 miles and is served by 11 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 15,189 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 77.2% on-time rate with an average delay of 68.5 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 6,165 flights were recorded on this pairing — 88 cancelled (1.4%) and 20 diverted (0.3%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 11 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 15,189 total flights analyzed, the 77.2% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 68.5-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Jan 2025 posted the best performance on this corridor at 86% on-time, while Apr 2024 came in at 46% on-time — a 40-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the BUR to SFO route, the combination of a 77.2% on-time rate, 68.5-minute average delay, 1.4% recent cancellation rate, and 11 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from BUR to SFO?
Flights from Burbank to San Francisco have a 77.2% on-time rate based on 15,189 flights. The average delay is 68.5 minutes. The best recent month was Jan 2025 with 86% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for BUR to SFO?
Over the last 24 months, 1.4% of flights on this route were cancelled (88 of 6,165 flights) and 0.3% were diverted.
How far is the flight from BUR to SFO?
The flight distance from Burbank (BUR) to San Francisco (SFO) is approximately 326 miles. This route is served by 11 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from BUR to SFO?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Jan 2025 (86% on-time). The worst was Apr 2024 (46% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from BUR to SFO?
The Burbank to San Francisco route is served by 11 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from BUR to SFO?
Flights from Burbank to San Francisco experience an average delay of 68.5 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 77.2% based on 15,189 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial