PlainFlights

Atlanta to San Antonio

Atlanta, GA → San Antonio, TX

Total Flights

16,264

On-Time Rate

81.7%

Avg Delay

60.0 min

Distance

874 mi

Carriers

10

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 250 52 6 0 DL,WN,F9
Nov 2025 250 47 4 0 DL,F9,WN
Oct 2025 275 40 0 0 DL,WN,F9
Sep 2025 260 36 0 0 WN,DL,F9
Aug 2025 270 48 2 0 WN,F9,DL
Jul 2025 277 87 1 0 DL,NK,WN,F9
Jun 2025 296 98 6 2 DL,WN,F9,NK
May 2025 300 98 1 0 DL,NK,WN,F9
Apr 2025 269 72 3 0 DL,NK,WN
Mar 2025 248 52 0 2 DL,WN
Feb 2025 197 39 0 0 DL,WN
Jan 2025 205 45 10 0 DL,WN
Dec 2024 246 56 0 1 DL,WN
Nov 2024 236 21 0 2 WN,DL
Oct 2024 261 21 1 0 DL,WN
Sep 2024 247 45 0 1 WN,DL
Aug 2024 260 38 1 0 DL,WN
Jul 2024 272 106 15 1 DL,WN
Jun 2024 267 50 1 0 DL,WN
May 2024 269 85 1 0 DL,WN
Apr 2024 253 56 0 0 DL,WN
Mar 2024 237 47 0 0 DL,WN
Feb 2024 207 24 0 0 DL,WN
Jan 2024 231 42 0 3 DL,F9,WN

Cancellation Rate

0.9%

52 of 6,083 flights

Diversion Rate

0.2%

12 of 6,083 flights

What the Data Says About ATL to SAT

The Atlanta to San Antonio corridor (ATL → SAT) covers roughly 874 miles and is served by 10 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 16,264 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 81.7% on-time rate with an average delay of 60.0 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 6,083 flights were recorded on this pairing — 52 cancelled (0.9%) and 12 diverted (0.2%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 10 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 16,264 total flights analyzed, the 81.7% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 60.0-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Oct 2024 posted the best performance on this corridor at 92% on-time, while Jul 2024 came in at 61% on-time — a 31-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the ATL to SAT route, the combination of a 81.7% on-time rate, 60.0-minute average delay, 0.9% recent cancellation rate, and 10 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from ATL to SAT?
Flights from Atlanta to San Antonio have a 81.7% on-time rate based on 16,264 flights. The average delay is 60.0 minutes. The best recent month was Oct 2024 with 92% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for ATL to SAT?
Over the last 24 months, 0.9% of flights on this route were cancelled (52 of 6,083 flights) and 0.2% were diverted.
How far is the flight from ATL to SAT?
The flight distance from Atlanta (ATL) to San Antonio (SAT) is approximately 874 miles. This route is served by 10 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from ATL to SAT?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Oct 2024 (92% on-time). The worst was Jul 2024 (61% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from ATL to SAT?
The Atlanta to San Antonio route is served by 10 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from ATL to SAT?
Flights from Atlanta to San Antonio experience an average delay of 60.0 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 81.7% based on 16,264 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial