PlainFlights

Houston to Mission/McAllen/Edinburg

Houston, TX → Mission/McAllen/Edinburg, TX

Total Flights

5,811

On-Time Rate

83.2%

Avg Delay

77.1 min

Distance

316 mi

Carriers

16

Monthly Performance

Recent 24 months of route data.

Period Flights Delayed Cancelled Diverted Carriers
Dec 2025 49 14 0 0 UA,OO
Nov 2025 90 23 0 0 OO,UA
Oct 2025 68 9 0 0 OO,UA
Sep 2025 36 5 0 0 UA,OO
Aug 2025 31 5 0 0 UA
Jul 2025 31 9 0 0 UA
May 2025 53 15 1 0 OO,UA
Apr 2025 63 13 0 0 OO,UA
Mar 2025 64 14 0 0 OO,UA
Feb 2025 75 14 0 0 OO,UA
Jan 2025 97 8 6 0 OO,UA
Dec 2024 79 16 2 0 OO,UA
Nov 2024 77 5 0 0 OO,UA
Oct 2024 108 12 0 0 UA,OO
Sep 2024 67 9 1 0 OO,UA
Aug 2024 54 12 1 0 UA
Jul 2024 51 25 5 0 UA
Jun 2024 33 15 0 0 OO,UA
May 2024 53 18 4 2 OO,UA
Apr 2024 50 6 0 0 OO,UA
Mar 2024 86 19 2 0 UA
Feb 2024 92 8 0 0 OO,UA
Jan 2024 76 10 6 0 OO,UA
Dec 2023 35 3 0 0 OO,UA

Cancellation Rate

1.8%

28 of 1,518 flights

Diversion Rate

0.1%

2 of 1,518 flights

What the Data Says About IAH to MFE

The Houston to Mission/McAllen/Edinburg corridor (IAH → MFE) covers roughly 316 miles and is served by 16 carriers, based on Bureau of Transportation Statistics reporting. Across 5,811 flights in the dataset, this route posts a 83.2% on-time rate with an average delay of 77.1 minutes when flights run late. Over the most recent 24 months of BTS data, 1,518 flights were recorded on this pairing — 28 cancelled (1.8%) and 2 diverted (0.1%). Those baseline metrics tell you what to expect before you book.

Having 16 carriers on the route matters: more carriers generally means more daily schedule options, competitive pricing, and redundancy when flights are cancelled. With 5,811 total flights analyzed, the 83.2% on-time figure is statistically meaningful rather than a small-sample fluke. The 77.1-minute average delay applies only to flights that actually ran late, so it is not the average wait across all departures — the majority of flights on this route depart on time under the BTS definition of a delay (15+ minutes past schedule).

Looking at recent months, Nov 2024 posted the best performance on this corridor at 94% on-time, while Jul 2024 came in at 51% on-time — a 43-point gap between best and worst recent month. For travelers evaluating the IAH to MFE route, the combination of a 83.2% on-time rate, 77.1-minute average delay, 1.8% recent cancellation rate, and 16 available carriers is the concrete summary of what BTS data shows about reliability on this pairing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often are flights delayed from IAH to MFE?
Flights from Houston to Mission/McAllen/Edinburg have a 83.2% on-time rate based on 5,811 flights. The average delay is 77.1 minutes. The best recent month was Nov 2024 with 94% on-time.
What is the cancellation rate for IAH to MFE?
Over the last 24 months, 1.8% of flights on this route were cancelled (28 of 1,518 flights) and 0.1% were diverted.
How far is the flight from IAH to MFE?
The flight distance from Houston (IAH) to Mission/McAllen/Edinburg (MFE) is approximately 316 miles. This route is served by 16 carriers.
When is the best time to fly from IAH to MFE?
The best recent month for on-time performance was Nov 2024 (94% on-time). The worst was Jul 2024 (51% on-time). Consider booking during months with historically better performance.
How many airlines fly from IAH to MFE?
The Houston to Mission/McAllen/Edinburg route is served by 16 carriers. More carriers generally means more schedule options and competitive pricing.
What is the average delay on flights from IAH to MFE?
Flights from Houston to Mission/McAllen/Edinburg experience an average delay of 77.1 minutes when delayed. The overall on-time rate is 83.2% based on 5,811 flights analyzed.

Explore PlainFlights

Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), On-Time Performance Data. Statistics reflect cumulative performance across all available reporting periods.

Related

Data sourced from Bureau of Transportation Statistics, FAA, NHTSA, DOT, and CPSC public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFlights Editorial